tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25010298.post-69812151088373314982007-11-07T12:21:00.000-08:002007-11-07T12:21:00.000-08:002007-11-07T12:21:00.000-08:00Using a receive loop is definitely an option if you can manage the extra size overhead (which I agree is fairly small). The out-of-order packets was meant to be more of an illustration of another way of going about it that wouldn't impact size :) Metasploit's current solution fixes the problem without adding any size overhead or the need for a receive loop (the intermediate stager).skapehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16314095165651222279noreply@blogger.com